|
Margarida Calafate Ribeiro
Africa in the feminine:
Portuguese Women and the Colonial War (pp.7-29)
This paper seeks to delineate the general lines that, in the
historical, political, sociological and literary critical discourse,
have led to a consideration of the war as a not exclusively male
phenomenon. Concerning the Portuguese situation, the author seeks to
interpret the “supporting role” that has always been reserved for women
in public and private, and analyze in greater detail the perhaps
unprecedented situation of the Portuguese women who accompanied their
husbands on military missions to Africa during the period of the
Colonial War.
Maria Manuela Cruzeiro
Women and the Colonial War:
An excessively loud silence (pp.31-41)
The aim of this paper is to expose the different layers of silence that
have enabled Portuguese society to evade the inevitable encounter with
the greatest tragedy of its contemporary history: the Colonial War. The
strategy of concealment, which frequently swings between repression and
denial, touches both its direct participants (the mobilized military)
and the established institutions, as well as, especially, its most
ignored victims: women. Naturally excluded from the machinery of war,
though deeply involved in its devastating effects, the women’s silence
renders this traumatic moment of our recent history doubly absurd and
incomprehensible.
Helena Neves
Love in a time of war: The
(im)possible (in)communicability of the Colonial War (pp.43-63)
The period of the Colonial War (1961-1974) produced deep demographic,
economic, social and cultural changes in Portugal. But if what is
measurable is currently more or less visible, there is another
dimension that remains practically unstudied: intersubjective
experiences, emotions and love relationships during the time of the
war. This paper presents an empirical survey of this problematic which
needs to be further analyzed.
Maria Manuel Lisboa
"To the end of the world":
Love, resentment and war in Hélia Correia (pp.65-83)
Hélia Correia’s play O rancor: Exercício sobre Helena is the basis for
a textual analysis of both classical and modern understandings of the
role of women in the context of war. In Hélia Correia’s contemporary
version, women reproduce and highlight some of the signs already
present in Greek tragedy and epic poetry in what concerns the
problematic of female sexuality and passion, as countervailing forces
to the male warlike instinct, which they eventually overthrow. The
reading presented here focuses on different aspects of the
juxtaposition of the sexes in the context of war: namely, the dynamic
between mother and daughter as agents of female solidarity in
confrontation with the male warlike imperative; the mother-son
relationship as inscribed in the filial oedipal dilemma of choice
between the warrior father and the atavistically loved mother; the
question of maternity/paternity and of the voluntary or refused
sacrifice of sons and daughters to the interests of war; and the
problem of the passional representation of the enemy as an object of
desire and figuration of the ideal of the beloved.
Roberto Vecchi
Non-coincidences of women
authors. Fragments of a not-only-about-love discourse in the literature
of the Colonial War (pp.85-100)
If war is primarily the territory of the androcentric, the traumatic
experience of war and its representation by the feminine eye insert
themselves in a peripheral margin, a border of dislocation of the
traumatic experience itself. From this point of view, the feminine
becomes a “witnessing eye” par excellence, the surviving, residual
possibility of the impossibility of fully bearing witness to the
traumatic event. This dislocation reveals the non coincidence between
experience and image, characteristic of the testimony, in which
feminine logos and memory become trenchant carriers of another logos, a
counter-memory. The novels of Wanda Ramos and Lídia Jorge are also
resituated in the tragic problematic of the testimonial aporia, showing
how a critical reflection on the modern tragic enables a more inclusive
view of a problematic literature – because of its struggle with history
– such as that of the Colonial War.
Ana de Medeiros
Rewriting History: Lídia
Jorge’s A Costa dos Murmúrios and Assia Djebar’s L’Amour, la fantasia (pp.101-115)
Within the general theme of the incompatibility between private and
public life, this paper focuses on a series of elements that are common
to both texts to be analyzed here and that partly explain their
subversive quality, in a political and historical sense: the idea of
dominant representations of woman as false representations, the
restoring of the past of female self-representation, and the
recognition of the need of representing the differences among women.
Lynn Hunt’s work on the French Revolution provides the theoretical
basis for the beginning of this analysis.
Laura Cavalcante Padilha
Two views and a war (pp.117-128)
Starting from a reading of the poetical works Sangue negro (2001) and É
nosso o solo sagrado da terra (1978), by Noémia de Sousa and Alda
Espírito Santo, respectively, this paper seeks to capture two African
views on the war, following simultaneously an ethnic and a gender
perspective. It discusses the double gesture of naming the conflict;
the changing, in the discoursive universe, of the reference system
imposed by colonialism and, as a consequence, the staging of the
interiority of new female historical subjects.
|